Watch our ArmorSkin training video to learn how to use Blauer tactical armor carriers for men to your advantage. Our three-piece armor concealment system also includes a duty belt suspension system along with wicking base layer vest shirts, giving officers and guards the complete protection package.
We want these universal armor vests to feel like a natural part of your wardrobe and continue to research and develop new ways to do so. We’ve included mesh lining, side opening, secure pockets, mic tabs, five-crease styling and other features that improve the function and comfort of each vest. Our commitment to making a better armor-carrying system doesn’t stop there. With more than a dozen vest carrier colors, there’s something that goes with your department’s apparel. By using our advanced fabrics and construction such as Rayon, polyester and cotton, we’ve made our outer vest carriers so they mirror an everyday uniform shirt, meaning you can keep a lower profile when a situation calls for it. This makes them easier to get on and off, and also gives you an in-between layer so they don’t chafe against your skin. Unlike most armor carrying systems that go underneath the regular uniform, these men’s armor vest covers are designed to be worn over a duty shirt, polo shirt or one of our ArmorSkin base shirts. Our ArmorSkin® ballistic cover system can be used to make armor from major manufacturers less of a burden and more of an asset when facing potential danger. Blauer men’s tactical vest carriers are the new standard for body armor systems among patrol cops, special ops and penal officers who need additional protection. And as many officers have told us, it’s harder to perform at your best when you’re struggling with your apparel. However, many modern armor carriers are rigid, bulky, hot and just flat-out uncomfortable as well. According to the complaint, Point Blank Enterprises has refused to notify purchasers of the vests of the alleged defect, and has yet to recall the products.Body armor is becoming a standard part of uniforms for more and more first responders due to concerns about safety. and Protective Apparel Corporation of America model vests, touted by the defendant in its marketing materials as including an exclusive “Self-Suspending Ballistic System” feature, contain a concealed manufacturing defect that cannot be detected by proposed class members until the vests fail, creating an “imminent and substantial danger” to law enforcement. point blank vest for sale in great to excellent pre owned condition. The 34-page complaint alleges the Point Blank Body Armor, Inc. Point blank body armor carrier vest size medium no. are defective to the extent that they pose a “life-threatening safety issue” and cannot be reasonably relied upon for their intended use. The Ohio State Troopers Association, Inc., the International Union of Police Associations, and three individual officers have filed a proposed class action lawsuit that alleges the shoulder straps on certain model bulletproof vests manufactured by defendant Point Blank Enterprises, Inc. The plaintiffs filed the appeal after the judge overseeing their case denied class certification and dismissed the case on August 24, 2020. The three-judge panel wrote in a September 27 opinion that the district court was correct in finding there existed no common evidence of a class-wide defect in Point Blank’s bulletproof vests at the time of sale, that the proposed classes are “overbroad,” that individual issues predominate over issues common to the proposed classes and that the plaintiffs have failed to provide a class-wide method for calculating damages.Īccording to the panel, the lower court properly found that individual inquiries would be required to determine how each consumer used their vest and whether they experienced the alleged defect.Īll told, the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that there are “questions of fact or law” common to proposed class members, i.e., those who the lawsuit sought to cover, that could produce common solutions and be resolved on a class-wide basis, the panel wrote. The August 2020 dismissal of the case detailed on this page has been affirmed after an appellate panel found that the lower court applied the correct legal standard and did not abuse its discretion in denying class certification.